What do you think she meant when she said “a huge black monster with giant claws”?

The 44th New York Film Festival
The 43rd New York Film Festival
The 42nd New York Film Festival
The New York Film Festival inevitably seems to function as a sort of gateway for the season’s notable festival films, a threshold by which New York reheats the offerings of Cannes, Venice, and Toronto for the U.S. market. By our count, there are 17 films showing here that have already had a recent screening at Toronto, although admittedly it is more difficult to find a film made in the last year that is not showing at the prevalent Canadian festival.
However, if this sounds as if the most important film festival in the self-proclaimed cultural capital of the world is basically just a bunch of leftovers, we challenge anyone not to be tempted by the delectable, if familiar, offerings. With new films by Hou Hsiao-hsien, Béla Tarr, Brian DePalma, Todd Haynes, Claude Chabrol, Abel Ferrara, Catherine Breillat, Julian Schnabel, Alexander Sokurov, Noah Baumbach, Carlos Reygadas, Gus Van Sant, Eric Rohmer, Jia Zhangke, and the Coen Brothers (their first film since their highly dubious 2004 remake of The Ladykillers), even the most fastidious of cinephiles will find little at which to sniff.
And so what if the blood of popular enthusiasm runs slightly higher for Wes Anderson’s latest scoop of cinematic blancmange, nationally (and semi-pointlessly) premiering at the festival on its Opening Night the day before it hits New York theaters? There’s plenty more that’s making it to New York for the first time, including Lee Chang-dong’s acclaimed Secret Sunshine (which won Jeon Do-yeon the Best Actress award at Cannes), Sidney Lumet’s heist melodrama Before the Devil Knows You’re Dead (easily the octogenarian’s best film in a decade, if not two or three), and Marjane Satrapi and Vincent Paronnaud’s pot-stirring Persepolis, which shared the Cannes Jury Prize with another NYFF film, Reygadas’ unpredictably grown-up Stellet Licht. Added to this film fest omnibus are a polychrome-tinted 1920 German version of Hamlet starring the epicene Asta Nielsen, a new print of Von Sternberg’s long-M.I.A. gangster ur-noir Underworld (celebrating its 80th anniversary with a potentially ill-advised score by the Alloy Orchestra), and the wishfully-titled Blade Runner: The Final Cut.
Even compared to last year's dense program, it's a full docket for us New Yorkers.
Please refer to this page for the next few weeks for updated coverage of a wide array of festival films. The 45th New York Film Festival runs September 28th – October 14th.

Despite a few detours, we will remain on the Darjeeling Limited as Peter Whitman reunites with his brothers, Francis and Jack, during a journey through India in search of spirituality, atonement, and badly needed family bonding. Director Wes Anderson’s fifth feature relies on this now perhaps too familiar theme of estranged families and mutual grief, certain to please his zealous fans but not necessarily enamour the rest of us.

While Nielsen’s portrayal specifically picks up on Hamlet’s famous indecision, there is little to imply that her concealed female identity renders her weak. Lithe and slender, Nielsen’s facial features are as striking as Garbo’s, while her body language as Hamlet is as self-aware as Tilda Swinton maneuvering between sexes in the more recent Orlando.

Text and image – and, by extension, reasoning and reality – vie throughout the director’s work, and here, as in Claire’s Knee there are constant tugs of war between what we read onscreen and what we observe enacted, between rules, poems, and dicta laid out by the characters or the narration and the complex situations that arise because (or in spite) of these.

Lee’s great achievement in Secret Sunshine, his first film after serving for two years as South Korea’s Minister of Culture and Tourism, is not only in crafting a natural, well-paced, and utterly uncontrived screenplay, but also in exercising the patience necessary to follow Shin-ae as she weathers the story’s many trials. Even as the film piles awkwardness and suffering upon its character, it never feels exploitative or emotionally manipulative, maintaining a restrained tone entirely devoid of melodrama.

Alex’s conscious decision to remain silent significantly offers up a moral ambiguity that is applicable beyond the circumstances of what has happened to one boy in Portland, Oregon. As with his recent work, it becomes clear that Van Sant has become not only an essential auteur, but more specifically an American one, concentrating on and drawing from emotional rhythms that pulse within this country.

Amid the austerity, the heat and the dust, Alexandra appears as an embodied reminder of femininity and of nostalgia for childhood and home. This is made palpable in the simple image of Denis braiding his grandmother’s hair as he did as a child. The import is simple, tangible, and quite intimate, and Sokurov offers this image as a panacea for one of the major political issues of his nation in a way that is surprisingly direct.

Vacation has allowed them a little breathing room, a small escape from the complications and conundrums of their life back in New York. There is a tiny indication on Andy’s face that once back in the clutches of their life in the city, these distractions and problems will return; there is no permanent escape from them. Unless, of course, you have money.

Though our perspective is precisely aligned with Jean-Do Bauby’s functioning left eye throughout the film, our point of view is still unmistakably Schnabel’s, with its flashes of color and restive hunger for light, images, text, and beautiful women. As in Orson Welles’ aborted adaptation of Heart of Darkness, in which the camera was to tell the story entirely from Marlow’s (that is, Welles’) point of view, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly aggressively conflates the camera and the audience’s vision with Bauby’s, all under the control of Schnabel’s own particular way of seeing.

While there’s little that is delicate or traditionally feminine about her, Vellini emits a magnetic sexual charge that Ryno becomes besotted with. In the various sexual positions the two entangle themselves in, Vellini is the more uninhibited and certainly dominating partner, while Ryno willingly accepts her whims, a power play that spills over into their treatment of one another outside the bedroom.

The Man from London bears Tarr’s aesthetic and tonal signatures pronouncedly—some are even lifted verbatim from his prior films. But there is an anomalous element at play, as well, one that resists the esotericism and nuance of Tarr’s previous work. To wit, in lieu of images of mammoth, biblical import, we have here a suitcase full of money.

Todd Haynes’ self-proclaimed supposition on one of music’s most prominent artists deals extensively with the projected relationships we conjure between our idols and ourselves. It’s almost an unwieldy concept, and certainly an intimidating one, but focusing on Bob Dylan, shape-shifter through more than four decades of history, reveals an occasionally reckless, extremely imaginative Haynes who seems intent on challenging both himself and his audience.
