Reviews / 11 July 2004

Psycho

Psycho
USA  /  1960

Psycho opens with the caption “Phoenix, Arizona … Friday, December the Eleventh … Two Forty-Three PM.” In this — the first slasher film — the specificity of location lends the film a truth. This convention functions to make otherwise clichéd horror mechanisms seem real, as they are given a ridiculously specific context. (Only Halloween benefits from its specific time and setting, borrowing from the macabre related to the titular holiday.)

The title credits of Psycho, the esteemed work of graphic designer Saul Bass, appear, and are divided horizontally — they are slashed apart. The visual corresponds with the film, its murders performed with a slicing butcher knife.

Psycho is a film with a distinct sexuality. Norman Bates appears to be an odd, nervous, and harmless individual, although his perversions (spying on Marion as she strips, his fascination with taxidermy/death) are affrontingly sexual. He sustains the presence of his mother with his hobby (and thus their relationship), and his personality is divided between himself and his mother’s, which he creates; he is both male and female. One half is aroused by Marion, the other repulsed by it. Norman fosters conflicting sexual roles.

However, “mother’s” crimes serve a double cause as they displace sexual impulses in the only way that will satisfy both personalities in Norman. In mother, murder reinforces her relationship with her son. For Norman the murders resemble intercourse, and are the most intimate sexual exchanges he has.

Psycho is not sexually exploitative despite its sexuality, though, as the title suggests, psychologically. The film forces its audience to spy, to be a voyeur (this is noticeably and subtly repeated from Rear Window). The establishing shot opening the film pans and zooms towards an open window, and the view enters the room. Inside are Marion Crane and her boyfriend, both in their underwear. The scene is tame by contemporary standards, though excluding its contemporary affects, we are still witness to what is an exclusive and intimate exchange between a couple. This idea is at play in numerous, other slasher films.

There are two shots that follow that reinforce our voyeurism: firstly, Norman spies on Marion through a peephole (the shot is an obsessive close-up of his eye); second, after her murder we see another, similarly intimate close-up of Marion’s eye. The first signals the audience’s position as voyeur, the second of killer. In this visual manner, Psycho is purposefully an exploitation film.

At its initial release Psycho was burdened by censors, who forced an edit of the infamous shower scene, darkening the lower half of the frame (although careful sights will see no nudity). Psycho was cited for its obscenity. Crane in her brassiere in two scenes prior to her staying at the Bates Motel. Furthering the claim, it is said to be the first film containing a flushing toilet, violating previous filmic ignorance of the existence of bathrooms. These elements combine to make the film obscene; as many have said, watching Psycho elicited guilt in its viewers. According to critic Danny Peary:

“It wasn’t the sex and violence alone that unnerved us, but — and this is what people usually forget — that we felt guilty about watching the sex and violence.”


Comments / 3 total / Submit Comment

  1. Richard 23
    9 October 2006
    4:50 AM

    Hmmm, but you didn’t mention Bernard Hermann’s incredible score? A great film, an interesting novel and a fabulous soundtrack!


  2. marky
    10 October 2006
    12:29 AM

    Hermanns’ score goes without saying; it was the definitive musical movement to all future slasher films. Hitchcock demands of us, “We are the makers of the music, we are the dreamers of the dreams.”


  3. Nate
    2 March 2007
    8:31 PM
    Website

    In my opinion, without Psycho, the “slasher”/”stalker” film wouldn’t be here. Anyone getting into or new to the “slasher”/”stalker” film, or horror films, in general, should watch (the original) Psycho first! Thank you Anthony Perkins, Janet Leigh, and, of course, Sir Alfred Hitchcock, himself! R.I.P.


Submit Comment / Some HTML is OK / Preview your remarks below


Preview Comment

Credits

Directed by
Alfred Hitchcock

Review by
Rumsey Taylor

Source
Universal Studios DVD


Statistics

Posted on
11 July 2004

Read
2175 times

Comments
3

Jump to comments
Submit comment

Recent Updates