Reviews / 19 October 2007

City of the Living Dead

City of the Living Dead
Paura nella città dei morti viventi / The Gates of Hell  /  Italy  /  1980

About the same time that Andrea Bianchi was crafting The Nights of Terror, his masterpiece of unrelenting gloom, another Italian director of zombie films was hard at work on his own contribution to the genre. But where Bianchi contented himself with stripping the zombie film of all but the barest semblance of character development or story arc, Lucio Fulci, one of the originators of apocalyptic zombie horror, changed tact entirely. Part supernatural mystery, part psychological thriller, part grisly zombie horror, Fulci’s City of the Living Dead is a multifaceted, character-driven tale of terror that manages the impressive feat of creating an appreciable atmosphere of fear while holding its death-defying denizens in check for the bulk of the picture.

The story begins in a small town in the northeastern United States, with a pale-faced priest, Father Thomas, hanging himself. At the same moment, in New York City, we witness a séance in progress, and a young woman named Mary tormented by a vision of the dead man. To maker matters worse, she’s convinced that the priest’s death was no cry for help, but a deliberate sacrifice intended to open a portal to hell and unleash an army of the dead unto the earth. And it just so happens that it’s only a matter of days until the portal is unsealed, and the dead given license to roam free. Assisted by an inquisitive reporter named Peter, Mary sets herself the task of tracking down the mortal remains of the priest, and seeing what she can do about avoiding the impending zombie doom.

Fulci’s inspired decision to center his tale around a specific and terrible event that is fast approaching affords him the freedom to devote a significant portion of his narrative to subplots – a woman struggling to free herself of psychological demons, a boy dealing with the death of his sister, a pair of bar flies contemplating the strange goings on in their home town – for we know that a gruesome day of reckoning is coming, even if scene after scene passes without any direct reference to zombies. In addition, the slow horror build up allows time for Mary and Peter to develop into fully-fledged characters that we fear for. A zombie film that makes you eager to know who will die next is entertaining. One that makes you apprehensive as to who will die next is enthralling.

But even with such balanced narrative touches and nuanced storytelling, this is still a Lucio Fulci film, and Fulci means gore. Even before the zombies take center stage, the deceased priest treats us to several blood-soaked hauntings. Inexplicably blessed with both the power to teleport, and to kill just by looking at his victims, Father Thomas bides his time until the release of the zombies by removing brains from the back of skulls and inducing intestines to erupt from their owner’s mouth. And when the zombie hordes, in all their burnt flesh glory, are finally released, the wait is well worth it.


City of the Living Dead

Mike meets a zombie


Comments / 3 total / Submit Comment

  1. Steve O’Rourke
    2 November 2007
    8:04 PM

    I actually saw this gem, by myself, on Christmas Eve/Christmas, 1980 (thanks, HBO). When it came to the scene where the teenaged girl was puking up her guts and audibly choking on them, and I could literally only watch the scene, OR listen to it, but not both! Even at 25, and having been a lifelong horror fan, I guess Sr. Fulci still had something to teach me.


    But still, what the hell did the ending mean???


  2. Thomas
    3 November 2007
    11:20 AM
    Website

    According to Jamie Russell’s Book of the Dead, which includes a quote from Fulci, the ending was not intended to be confusing, or pessimistic. But owing to an “aberration on the film,” the final shots took on a decidedly menacing tone that the editor liked, and that’s what they went with. As with much of Fulci, I think the visual interest of the scene was more important than any logical conclusion.


  3. Alex
    9 April 2008
    11:21 AM

    First Fulci film i was ever uh exposed to(in the childrens’ floor of thmy local hospital no less) and I have to admit I only picked him up in the first place because of the high esteem so many extreme horror sites held him in. Regurgitated entrails? Raining maggots? DRILL THROUGH THE HEAD!?…..drools Now he’s one of my favourite directors, hack or not. There is a real tawdry ugliness to his best films(and Lucio made some real unwatchable garbage there near the end) a seething kind of hatred just boiling beneath the surface that elevates his pulp material into something else, something uncomfortable & really disturbing. There like gore films through a bargain basement art school lens. I’d take him over the distancing, insanely over the top theatrics of Argento anyday, at least this is something I can really feel. Also couldn’t care less about wether he plays by the standard narrative ‘rules’ or not. Fulci had no yen for womenkind either.


Submit Comment / Some HTML is OK / Preview your remarks below


Preview Comment

Credits

Directed by
Lucio Fulci

Review by
Thomas Scalzo

Source
Blue Underground DVD


Related articles

Reviews Let Sleeping Corpses Lie

Reviews The Nights of Terror

Reviews Night of the Creeps


Categories


Statistics

Posted on
19 October 2007

Read
4341 times

Comments
3

Jump to comments
Submit comment

Recent Updates